Eurovision

Ted and Dougal

It's that time of year again -- summer's here. The outdoor swimming pools are open; another Big Brother is underway (for Brits); and the whole of Europe lay down their arms and take their grudges/allegiances to the ultimate European court -- The Eurovision Song Contest. Every year, the whole of Europe vies for this most coveted of all prizes and the chance to host the contest the following year (except maybe Ireland who won three years in a row and probably only lost in the fourth year because they already had their hat-trick and were sick of having to host it anyway -- who can forget Fathers Ted and Dougal's entry My Lovely Horse? (Dream Version; video)).

Here's what Mark has to say:

Like the late great John Peel, I've always been a big fan of Eurovision. The Eurovision Song Contest is a wonderful old institution launched back in 1956, making this year's the 51st contest. It takes place before a massive European television audience on a Saturday night in May (though it used to be April) every year. Twenty-something countries each select a song from their own national heats and each country performs it on the night in front of the live audience. In recent years, as the number of countries in Europe has expanded, they have also introduced a semi-final heat to keep the number of countries in the final down to about 24 or so. The host each year is the country to have won it the previous year. The most famous winners ever are ABBA, who won it for Sweden with Waterloo in 1974. I didn't watch that one myself, though I did see ABBA live a full five years later, at Wembley Arena in November 1979 (when Gimme Gimme Gimme was in the charts). I think the first one I watched was in 1977, and I've watched it most years since, though there was a hiatus in my college years because (a) Eurovision was massively uncool in the 1980s and (b) staying in on a Saturday night was even more uncool.

Jemini

There are many pleasures involved in watching Eurovision, but it is not easy to explain the attraction to those who have not experienced it. It's certainly not about the musical quality. Many of the songs are pretty grim, including often the UK's entry, especially the year when poor old Jemini got 0 (nil) points (2003). [The song was bad, but not that bad. It was when the Iraq war had just begun, to most of the rest of Europe's dismay. We in the UK, while acknowledging that the song was not very good, saw "nil points" as a bit of a protest to the Iraq war. It was a blow to our pride as we always used to laugh at countries that got "nil points". (Ed.)]

John Peel always used to say that he loved the scoring, and I must admit that that is my favourite bit, where each country reads out the result of its own voting in English and French, and the scoreboard is adjusted as the votes get totted up. The character of the Eurovision as a UK television experience is all about Terry Wogan's now legendary commentary. He's been doing it for years and Viola and I went through a phase of finding it annoying, but have now realized that he is what makes it.

So, this is our first Eurovision since moving to America, but are we going to be able to view it? To be honest, I'd completely forgotten about it until I was looking at the BBC1 website tonight to check for the times for Doctor Who (second part of an great story on the Cybermen) and I noticed the big spread for Eurovision. Naturally, I began wondering how we would be able to view it over here. It seems that there is not much hope for watching it live on air. Others in the US have apparently been asking themselves the same question, as a page of Google Answers testifies. According to one of those comments, those with DirecTV have the best chance of getting it live, by tuning in to one of the European channels available on that satellite system. But we have Time Warner Cable (as well as some holes in the roof left by the Dishman), which is no good. On occasions like this, we turn to the internet and the good news is that there is a solution available. Eurovision TV provide a Live Webcast of the final:

Eurovision: Live Webcast

Daz Sampson

You have to download the Octoshape plug-in but it promises a high quality, 700kbps stream, which is a good deal better than the one I received for the cricket on Willow TV, which is perfectly adequate. So, it looks like we'll be plugging the laptop into the telly again and at 3pm Eastern Time, it'll be time to make the chilli popcorn and glue ourselves to the settee for three hours of Eurovision entertainment. And the UK entry from Daz Sampson, surely has a fine chance of success -- it's a very catchy tune, and it has a gimmick. Go Daz!

March 9, 2007

When I first published this post, I could only get a couple of audio clips of My Lovely Horse. Since then, YouTube has become flooded with Father Ted posts, so I decided to retrospectively add a couple of links.

Here's Ted and Dougal practicing:



Here's the dream version:

The Hawaiian-Themed Father-Daughter Dance

While fathers and daughters from all over the neighbourhood lived it up with pizza, ice-cream and a pineapple on each table (just to give the school hall a Hawaiian ambiance), poor ol' mothers everywhere had to sit around at home and feel left out. Here's some photos:

Emily, Mark and Lauren before the dance
Lauren has a piggy-back ride with her friend

Emily enjoys a quiet drink
Emily enjoys another quiet drink (or is it the same one?)

Some nutter managed to gatecrash
Lauren and her friend

Lauren
Emily

A great time was had by all (except, of course, Mum).

The Other Guy

The Other Guy

Guy Kewney

Have you caught the absolutely hilarious gaff on BBC News 24? They were covering the ruling in the court battle between Apple Records and Apple Computers and were supposed to interview Guy Kewney (a computing expert and journalist). Instead, they managed to get a guy (named Guy Goma, a Business Studies graduate from the Congo), who was waiting in the BBC Reception to be interviewed for an IT position. In a case of mistaken identity, the poor man was led to the News 24 studio, wired up, and asked his opinion live on air.

The best bit is watching his face as the interviewer introduces him. Priceless! When she then turns to the on-the-street correspondent and asks him his opinion, he says something to the effect of, "Well, pretty much what we've heard just there ...." So, the reporter was happy to agree with a poor bloke who thought he'd come for a job interview, found himself on live TV, and was winging it for all he was worth.

What was the real Guy Kewney doing while all this was going on? He was sitting in the BBC Reception, watching the other Guy being interviewed.

The clip is all over the internet, but here's one of the links, taken from the real Guy Kewney's blog:

Interview with the fake Guy (clip)

And here's a bit more information (also good for a laugh). The first three links are to the real Guy Kewney's blog and they chart his reactions from disbelief, to anger, to having a laugh at the BBC's expense:

Really, what matters is that the BBC doesn't look stupid...
That BBC video: the cab driver who edits Newswireless and lectures on iPods...
That "Guy" - he really is a Guy, and not a cab driver, either!
On-Air BBC Mixup Brings New Meaning to "Instapundit"
Guy Kewney, News 24 And The 'Other Guy Kewney'

May 17, 2006

Instead of just apologising and leaving it, BBC News 24 (not wanting to miss the bandwagon) decided that if everyone else is laughing at them, they may as well join in and embarrass themselves further. They decided to interview Guy Goma. The interview was intended to be a light-hearted jabbing at Guy Goma, with questions along the lines of "Why didn't you say that you weren't Guy Kewney?" (my paraphrase, not a direct quote), but came across as condescending. They obviously weren't listening to the man either, as they asked him the same questions more than once. This video clip is an interview with Guy Goma and a telephone interview with Guy Kewney. It is a very poor interview indeed. News 24 don't seem to realise that we're laughing at them, not with them.

Here's the clip:
Guy Goma interveiw on News 24

Graduation at Duke

Mark has is first Graduation Ceremony at Duke today, at which he's having to give a speech. He's written a US Graduation cf. UK Graduation post on his blog, which you might enjoy reading:
A Brit at Duke: Reflections of an Alien Professor

Roast Bush

This is old news. Although I've been aware of it, I haven't had time to blog on it. Have you seen Stephen Colbert's in-character speech at the White House Correspondents' Association Dinner? What I'd like to know is this -- how did he get booked, and has the person who booked him been sacked?

Thanks to Grish, at The Weekly View, for providing the link to
The full Colbert speech.

I also enjoyed watching The Daily Show's take on Ray McGovern confronting Rumsfeld and how CNN handled it.

Grish has a few more related links, so take a look.

How to cope without British TV and Radio: Cricket Supplement Update

An update from Mark:

In my previous post, How to cope without British TV and Radio: Cricket Supplement, I wrote:

Of course to get to that point you first have to have a Dish, so we have made the switch from the more expensive Time Warner Cable to Dish, and our new system is to be installed on Wednesday. In theory, therefore, I should be able to get up early on Thursday morning (5.45 a.m. ET start) and watch live cricket from Lords. It's a mouth-watering prospect, but I tend to be pretty pessimistic, believe-it-when-I-see-it, with exciting things like this, so I have made the decision not to look forward to it yet.

And what a good decision that turned out to be because it has, indeed, all gone pear shaped. We waited in this afternoon for the installation of our new Dish system and not long after 2 pm, just before the UEFA Cup Final was about to kick off (Middlesborough V. Sevilla, which I was going to try to catch on FSC), our Dish guy arrived and began surveying the property for where to put the dish. He decided pretty quickly on a fairly prominent spot on our front lawn. I didn't think too much of it, but realized I'd better consult Viola. As it turned out, she was not at all keen, and I became convinced too that it was not a great place. The Dish guy said that it was the only possible place on the entire property, though, because the trees blocked the signal everywhere else. An hour or so later, with the dish in place, I had to admit that it did look more ugly than I'd imagined and, moreover, it seemed likely that we'd soon be receiving a letter from our Home Owners Association about the newly arrived monstrosity.

"Holy holes-in-our-eaves
Dishman!"

But there was a further twist. The Dish guy found power lines and decided he could not put the dish there after all. He then went round to the back of the house and began knocking holes in our roof. A little longer and he announced that it was not going to be possible to get a signal there either and, after his boss came round to confirm the impossibility of the installation, he packed up everything and left. No new satellite system. No cricket for Mark. [But with a brand new poorly repaired hole in our lawn and several large holes in the eaves of our roof -- thanks Dish! (Ed.)]

And there, you might think, the story ends. No Dish, no cricket.

I started writing this update to my original post for Viola's blog and I was beginning to comment on the compensations -- the things I still had to look forward to in this cricket-free summer. I had heard that it would be possible to get the forthcoming Ashes series on broadband via Direct TV. On returning to their site to check up the links so that I could include this in the blog post, I followed a link to Willow TV, the distributors of the previously mentioned Direct TV Tour coverage.

And what can I say but "Eureka!"?

During the kerfuffle Emily
caught a toad (inexplicably
named Mr Froggy)

It turns out that Willow TV, "a portal for broadcasting premier sporting events", are also streaming "England Summer 2006" from Dish. Goodness only knows how few subscribers they must have since I have spent an absurd amount of time investigating such things, and nowhere did I find reference to this service. I stumbled across it in the course of writing this post. So now I have subscribed to Willow TV's broadband service and though the quality is not quite as high as what I'd be getting from the satellite dish, it looks pretty good. And I'll be able to watch it on the TV by plugging my laptop in to it, or on one of our computers, even at work (shh!).

What a result! I get to watch the cricket, and we don't have the eye-sore dish in our front garden. And one further comment -- the good news on the commentary front is that I am reliably informed that one can pick up Test Match Special for home tests on the net, in spite of the fact that one can't for the tours. So I look forward to tuning in to Aggers, Blowers and co. tomorrow.

May 12, 2006

Good news. The Willow TV coverage was not at all bad. The broadband feed was about 340 kbps, though they promise the availability of a feed at 500 kbps. The quality was fine, about as good as, say, the better BBC News Player programmes (e.g. This Week, which we also watched tonight while doing chores), but nothing like as strong as a normal TV signal. I fed it through the TV without difficulty, but it was not a widescreen picture. I wonder if the Sky Sports feed is in widescreen in the UK? Channel 4 had such a glorious widescreen coverage last year. I also had it on on the laptop, of course, and later on the desktop. Watching cricket via broadband makes it much more portable.

The most entertaining thing about the Willow TV coverage, which is drawn direct from Dish TV, is that the feed is taken not direct from Sky but via India's ESPN Live channel. So the TV has the ESPN logo throughout and also the Dish TV logo. In other words, it is the basic Sky Sports coverage featuring Gower, Botham, Bumble et al, but at the end of the over, the advertisements are for Indian products and aimed at India. For once, I found myself almost as interested in the advertisements between overs as in the cricket itself.

As a big fan of Test Match Special, I was delighted to discover that it is in fact possible to catch the commentary on-line in glorious quality all day (and nice to see that they'd grabbed Boycott from Channel 4, and that Sky had grabbed Atherton. No showing for Mark Nicholas, though). I had the TMS commentary on alongside the Willow/Dish/ESPN/Sky pictures for some of the day, but it seems that the Willow feed is a good 10-15 seconds behind the live TMS commentary. In some ways, it's an advantage -- you hear Blowers announcing a glorious 4 hit by Trescothick and you can then scamper over to the PC to catch it before it happens. I wonder if there is the same time lag between Sky and BBC? Presumably, the time lag is increased on its journey from England to India to the USA to my PC!

Also quite peculiar was the feeling of a home test match happening at 6 in the morning our time. It made it feel like a tour match, but it was at Lords. Very disconcerting!

May 13, 2006

Several fresh things to report on this story:

(1) The exciting Indian feed that I mentioned yesterday, which saw the signal originating with Sky Sports, going to India's ESPN Live, then to Dish TV and finally to Willow TV, was today past news. Today it was straight from Sky Sports to Dish TV to Willow TV, and gone were the Indian advertisements in between overs. In fact all there was between overs was a holding page, "Summer of Cricket 2006; Dish TV Pay Per View". The time lag on the feed seemed much shorter too, now about a ball away from the TMS commentary as opposed to two yesterday.

(2) Willow TV also now have the 500 kbps feed available, mentioned yesterday. And they have the most remarkable interactive scorecard. You can click on anything on the card and watch the video highlights, e.g. wickets, boundaries, etc. Technology at its best!

(3) I had not realized that there is also a little fun to be had at the site of Five's cricket coverage. As many will know, Five now have the rights in the UK to show one highlights package a day, featuring the old Channel 4 team of Mark Nicholas, Geoffrey Boycott and Simon Mann. Of course one cannot view the highlights on-line, but Five has put together a good site including a 2 minute broadband clip of Simon Mann introducing the day's play, well worth watching: Simon Hughes Video Analysis.

Points of Interest

1) Here's a "news report" at Here's the Thing that you might find quite funny:
Joke for the Day

2) You may also like to take a look at The Anglo-File, Too's pictures of Brum -- Cannon Hill Park, where we've spent many a happy day; an old church in Northfield; and the canal system in town and a potted history of the Industrial Revolution. It makes me feel rather nostalgic.

3) Have you seen/heard Sham 69's World Cup song Hurry Up, England (a rewrite of Hurry Up, Harry)? The link here is to The Mail on Sunday, who have it as a windows media file. We saw them perform it on Newsnight (downloaded from the BBC). Excellent!

How to cope without British TV and Radio: Cricket Supplement

Here's another supplement to Mark's now famous series of posts:

In the first of my posts in the series How to cope without British TV and Radio (see also Part 2; Part 3 and Football Supplement), I included a paragraph about cricket:

Cricket is initially more of a problem, but I think I've found the solution. It seems that Dish Network has the rights to the UK test matches for the next four years or so, and the good news is that Dish is much cheaper than Time Warner Cable. It'’s around $30 a month. You have to pay a premium, something like $70-$90 for the cricket for the season, but since that is now also the case in the UK too, with Sky taking the home test matches, it's not so much of a big deal. So at some point soon we are going to be making the switch. It's a fantastic thought that I will still be able to watch cricket in the summer. I could hardly hope for more.

Michael Vaughan
holding The Ashes

Well, the time has now come to take action, and it turns out that this is the most expensive so far of all the different methods of coping without British TV and radio, but it should be worth it. The test series against Sri Lanka begins on Thursday coming, May 11 (is it just me or are the test matches getting earlier every year? It seems like the season has hardly even begun), and it is indeed the case that Dish Network have the rights in America. Details are at Dish Pay Per View: Sport Listing and see also Dish Network Programming Pay Per View Cricket and Summer of Cricket schedule. It's more expensive than I had realized (above), but apparently $199.95 gets you all seven test matches (three v. Sri Lanka and four v. Pakistan) and a bunch of One Day Internationals too. (I am take it or leave it with the One Days, but heck, if it's in with the price, all the better). Of course to get to that point you first have to have a Dish, so we have made the switch from the more expensive Time Warner Cable to Dish, and our new system is to be installed on Wednesday. In theory, therefore, I should be able to get up early on Thursday morning (5.45 a.m. ET start) and watch live cricket from Lords. It's a mouth-watering prospect, but I tend to be pretty pessimistic, believe-it-when-I-see-it, with exciting things like this, so I have made the decision not to look forward to it yet.

Arran Brindle

But $199.95 for the test cricket is not too bad given that if we were still in the UK, we'd be paying for it for the first time this summer too. Sadly (because their coverage was so good), Channel 4 (Sunset and Vine) lost the rights last summer and now the only way to watch live test matches in the UK is to subscribe to Sky Sports. We used to have Telewest when we were in Birmingham, and it seems that they are charging £22 a month for Sky Sports (in addition to all the other charges), so at £100 for the summer, it's not a lot different from the $199.95 we will be paying. At this point, I have no idea what the Dish Network coverage will be like but I'd assume that they simply grab the Sky Sports coverage and take that over direct for all eight of us in the US who will be watching. What Fox Soccer Channel do with the football is to take over the Sky commentary but to repackage it with their own introductions and conclusions.

Speaking of the paucity of cricket fans on this side of the Atlantic, it is unremarkable to see how little there is on the web for American cricket lovers. The international cricket site, CricInfo, has a nice article on Cricket in America: An Historical Survey, from which this is an excerpt:

The first cricket clubs in the USA were established in the 1700s, not long after they made their first appearance in England. Originally played by officers of the British Army with local landed gentry predisposed to be Anglophiles, cricket became a major recreation of American gentlemen of leisure...and indeed, several Founding Fathers of the United States were known to be avid cricketers---John Adams among them, who stated in the US Congress in the 1780s that if leaders of cricket clubs could be called "presidents", there was no reason why the leader of the new nation could not be called the same!

The article goes on to explain how the sport declined in the US at the turn of the century; it remained "stubbornly elitest" at a time when baseball was taking over the American scene. The article claims (and I have not checked the validity of these claims) that baseball "created its independent mythology, and obviated the sport that gave it birth. In a few decades, cricket in America had become only a memory."

George W. Bush

Current American cricket websites include USCricket.com, the United States of America Cricket Association and Cricket for America, all of which do a great job, but these are all focused on playing the game. I am delighted to see that interest here, but there is next to nothing for those of us who would love to be players but who are not, on account of being so rubbish. The last time I played cricket was for our Dept of Theology cricket team in Birmingham, captained by Professor David Parker, and I came back injured or exhausted after each match and haven't played since. What is lacking over here is anything for those of us for whom cricket is all about watching others do the hard work, while enjoying a beer in the sunshine. On the off-chance that there are others like me, stranded in the States and missing the sights and sounds of first class cricket, I've set up a Yahoo!Group for English Cricket Fans in America. You never know, there might just be others out there, and I'd be interested to hear how others have coped. For one thing, what about Test Match Special? In the winter, it was unavailable over the net here, and I am guessing that the same is going to be true this summer. Is there any way around it?

May 10, 2006

An update to this post can be found at:
How to cope without British TV and Radio: Cricket Supplement Update

My First Snake

Do you remember, back in November, my blog on Snakes and Spiders? I hate the idea of sharing my back garden with snakes, but when we moved here, I decided that I would not over-react, but would educate myself and my family and take a few cues from what the natives do. Up until now, I have only seen a small snake that had been flattened by a car. The breaking news is that I have now seen my first live snake.

There is a local saying here -- "April-May, Stay Away." April and May are the months when the snakes (which are active for about 8 months of the year) are at their most active. It is their breeding season. It is the time of year when they are looking for somewhere to lay their eggs or have their babies and it is also the time of year when they are most likely to bite first and run (or should I say "slither"?) away later. Therefore, the rule is -- stay out of the woods in April and May. My neighbour had also told me that snakes have been known to nest in the crawl space under the house in past years.

I had also been told that naphthalene mothballs are very good for keeping snakes away. After a little research, I found out that naphthalene is the main ingredient in Snake-A-Way, the market-leading snake repellent. So, back in early April, I scattered a load of moth balls around the crawl space under our house to discourage snakes. (Because our house is built on a hill, the crawl space is big enough to stand up in and has a full size door leading into it. It also has a half-built extra room in it, which we thought we might finish-off and turn into a games room when we get around to it.) I also scattered one or two around the house, but they were just a few and have probably long since washed away. I didn't want to scatter them around the house too much because the chemical can be harmful to wildlife.

Our first realisation that there was a snake outside the window was when the cat (Memory) knocked over a table lamp. Upon investigating, we discovered that it was because she had been startled by a snake. As this was not only the first live snake that I've seen since being here, but the first wild live snake that I've seen other than in zoos, I grabbed my camera as quickly as I could and went totally snap-happy. I'm sure that future snakes will not get the same amount of attention, but this one got the full-blown paparazzi treatment.

As you can see, it's not a venomous snake, but even non-venomous snakes can bite (not to mention the fact that they totally creep me out), so I wasn't going to go outside to take my pictures. A quick google later and I found a web site for identifying snakes. It turns out that this one was a Black Rat Snake. They breed twice a year -- in April to June and in the Fall. They often climb trees and eat small rodents, birds and birds' eggs.

I have to say, though, that although seeing my first snake was quite exciting, I think that it calls for a few more moth balls to be scattered around the perimeter of the house. Alternatively, as it is not washed away by rain and a single treatment lasts for about three months I may invest in some Snake-A-Way.

Here's a few more shots:

(The criss-cross effect is due to many of the photos having been taken through windows with mesh on them. The last of the pictures is of another, slightly smaller snake that came along about half an hour later.)

Memories of May Day

Punts at the
Cherwell Boathouse

Today, I received an email from an old friend who lives in Oxford (England), wishing me a happy May Day. This took me right back to the good ol' days -- summer days spent punting (usually from the Cherwell Boathouse) to the Victoria Arms for a few pints, then punting back; or picnics in the University Parks; or getting kebabs from the kebab vans to eat on the way home after pub closing time.

May Morning was another fond memory. Many of the Oxford colleges will have had their balls the night before, so many of those gathered on Magdalen Bridge were those who had been up all night partying. I've never been to a ball, though. On more than one occasion, Mark and I had toyed with the idea of going to a ball, but always ended up deciding that the money could be better spent. I would have just been up all night chatting over a quiet drink with friends and drifting in and out of sleep.

The Magdalen College School
Choir at the top of
Magdalen College Tower

Then, when sunrise was approaching, off we'd toddle, to Magdalen Bridge, ready for the Magdalen College School choir to sing madrigals from the top of the Magdalen College tower at about 6am. In those days, there wasn't all the nonsense of people jumping off the bridge like there is today. Back then, you'd get two or three people stripping down to the nude and jumping off the bridge and into the Cherwell and a cheer would go up from the crowd. Last year, over one hundred people jumped off the bridge, many of whom suffered broken or sprained limbs. I don't know what this year was like, but really students -- enough is enough.

Morris Dancers

Then, everyone goes into town to watch the Morris Dancers and peruse the various stalls. We would slowly make our way to one of the many pubs (which opened early for May Morning) where we would stay until it was time to go to our lectures.

In the UK, the first Monday in May is always a Bank Holiday. This year, the Bank Holiday and May Day have coincided. I wouldn't be surprised if this has caused a large increase to the number of attendees to the May Day celebrations in Oxford, perhaps leading to an increase to the brainless leaping off a bridge into shallow water.

Home Movies

As you all know, I got a new digital camera for my birthday, so I thought I'd share the odd home movie with you.

Here's a couple for starters:

Lauren and Emily's Friend Singing Karaoke -- If you look closely, you'll see one of the cats playing with a ball in the background. If you look very closely, you may even spot Mark now and again.

Lauren Dancing

How to cope without British TV and Radio: Football Supplement

Another post by Mark:

In the first of my posts in the series How to cope without British TV and Radio (see also Part 2 and Part 3), I included a paragraph about football:

If you are a football fan, there's a whole channel devoted to it even on the basic cable packages. It's called Fox Soccer Channel and broadcasts a lot of live premiership football. One of my staples has become the 5 pm GMT (12 pm ET here) live match every Saturday. In fact, I am now watching more premiership football on American TV than I was on UK TV, because you have to subscribe specially to Sky TV for the live Premiership stuff in the UK. Fox Soccer Channel gives you the Sky commentary, but overlays it with an American introduction, which always refers to the "“EPL" (English Premier League), "soccer" and "game" (never "“match"”), e.g. they have a "player of the game"”.

One minor correction to that post: you don't get FSC (Fox Soccer Channel) with "even . . . the basic cable packages"; it tends to be a part of what they call "America's Top 180" Channels, but not "America's Top 60" or "America's Top 120", so usually you'll need a slightly more expensive package. Another additional comment: FSC also provides some coverage of the FA Cup. At the weekend, we had one of the semi-finals live, Middlesborough v. West Ham.

World Cup 2006
England Lineup

Lately, though, our attention has begun to turn to the World Cup, and we began to wonder about who was providing the coverage here in the USA, not least given that FSC were showing only limited signs of excitement about it. It turns out that all 64 matches are to be covered by ABC Sports and ESPN, as Viola mentioned, including even ESPN High Definition, if you have that. I've not fully got on top of what is what with American satellite and cable, but it certainly looks like ESPN and ESPN2 are on basic packages, so to get the World Cup you don't even have to have an expensive package.

What I hadn't realized until looking for details about the World Cup on the telly was that ESPN and ESPN 2 also sometimes broadcast other football matches, including -- it turns out -- European football. So today, for example, you can catch the second leg of the Champions League semi-final between Arsenal and Villarreal, 2.30 pm Eastern Time. What excellent news. It will be the first time I've watched European football since coming to the States, and it will be interesting to see if they take the ITV Commentary. I hope so.

Having missed all of the opportunities to watch European football until now because of this ignorance, I began to wonder how one could keep track of what's on where? I've found a great site called Live Soccer TV, which bills itself as "Your ultimate Soccer TV Guide" and it is, indeed, very useful. It gathers information from all over the place, and lets you know the schedule of what's on where, Live, Delayed and Recorded. Definitely one to bookmark.

Meanwhile, one will want to get some feeling for opinions on the ground, and one of my favourite podcasts is the 606 Football Phone In on FiveLive. I always listened to this when I could in the UK, and it's a pleasure to be able to catch it now, three times a week (four last week) via download.

I close with a confession: the other day, I found myself calling football "soccer".

New Technology and Old-Fashioned Communication

This is another guest blog by Mark, but on a slightly different topic to his previous posts.

A move across continents is, of course, a far easier business now than it would have been even ten years ago. Communicating with friends and family back home is a doddle via email and instant messaging, but there are other ways in which one can use the internet to communicate across the seas, ideal for keeping in touch with those among one's friends and family who are less computer-literate. Let me mention two in particular:

(1) Skype Out: Several of the Instant Messaging services (Yahoo!, MSN etc.) have an audio / video facility and so, with your broadband internet connection, you can talk to friends and family back home with ease, and even see their expressions and let them see yours. You can even show them your new pet cats. But this has two major drawbacks. First, you need your friends to be on-line when you are on-line yourself, and with the time difference, this is often not the case. Second, and more seriously, lots of people still do not have computers connected to the internet, and those who do have simply never entered the world of instant messaging. But there's a great way around these problems: Skype Out allows you to telephone people from your computer. It's very straightforward -- just download the software, plug in your headset and microphone, add some credit to your account, and then you are ready to telephone your friends overseas for next to nothing. It's not free, but it is cheap. We pay about a cent a minute to contact land-lines in the UK. Sometimes Skype will give you some free credit too. Occasionally one is unlucky and one gets a terrible line, but most of the time the line is great.

(2) Superletter: What about writing to those with no email? We all have older family members and older friends who have not joined the computer revolution. When I want to write to them (I'm not very good with paper, pens, envelopes, stamps and all that kerfuffle), I use Superletter.com. I first discovered this when a very good friend was out in Iraq. One can send a bluey for free to armed forces using Superletter. Having discovered it, I now use it to write letters to friends and family in the UK who don't have email. It doesn't cost much for each letter, 40 cents or so [cheaper than a stamp (Ed.)], and you get your first few free when you sign up. The gist of it is very simple: write the letter and add in the address. Superletter deliver it by post for you, usually about 48 hours after writing. One drawback: it strips out a lot of punctuation, but otherwise it's an excellent service.

Note: I am not affiliated with either of the above, nor am I profiting from recommending them! There are, I dare say, competitors to these, e.g. I know Yahoo! runs a similar service to Skype.

How to cope without British TV and Radio: Part III

Here's the third installment of Mark's TV/radio series of guest blogs:

This is the third in my series of posts on finding ways of getting access to British TV and radio when abroad (See How to cope without British TV and Radio and How to cope without British TV and Radio Part II. In those posts, I focused on two major areas, listening to BBC radio on-line (especially in Part 1) and watching BBC television on-line (particularly in Part 2). In this post, I would like to provide an update on some elements in those posts and then, in my next post, I will explore the world of podcasting.

Abbott & Portillo

Abbott & Costello

First, the updates. A new programme has this week been added to the BBC News Player, and it's one that I have been hoping that they would add for a while, This Week [features Abbott & Portillo cozying up together on the sofa; not to be confused with Abbot & Costello (Ed.)]. I don't think that a live broadcast is available, but you can watch it as soon as it is available. Remember that to get the broadband quality for these programmes, you need to bookmark the BBC News Player, go to "Programmes" and then select from the list.

Second, I have recently bought a wire that connects my laptop to our television set and so now we can even watch these things on our TV, at a decent volume, and not just on the laptop. Finding the right wire is itself something of a kerfuffle, and it took a couple of stabs before I got it right. In the USA there is no equivalent of the scart lead in the UK, and you'll have to have separate inputs for video and audio. After examining my laptop and the TV, and googling for a little, I found a nice lead on-line that went from my laptop's external monitor outlet to the TV's PC inlet, and had an adjoining wire that went from the laptop's headphone socket to the TV's PC audio inlet. The problem was that the distance between the external monitor outlet socket and the audio socket on my laptop was too great, and I had to get an extension from Wal-Mart. But all's well that ends well and it's wonderful to be able to watch broadband broadcasting like This Week and Newsnight on the TV, a further step in feeling more at home. In addition, it's much more convenient not to have to put our various downloads onto CD before we can watch those on the telly. For things like the latest Dr Who, it was a matter simply of watching it straight off the laptop fed into the telly and not first burning to CD. My advice to others in a similar situation would be to explore the possibilities for getting your PC or your laptop joined up to your telly. One little bit of exploring for the right wire(s) is so worthwhile.

Third, in a comment to the previous post on the topic, Jonny G asked whether there was much in the way of non-BBC TV content available on-line. I would say that the BBC are way ahead of the competition here. The only other place I go to at the moment for broadband TV broadcasts is Channel 4. There have been rumours for some time of Channel 4 making available its entire channel content streamed on-line. The fullest and most recent article I can find on this is here, in Digital Bulletin last year:

Channel 4 to air all content on broadband"
by Jeremy Lee Campaign, 7 July 2005

LONDON - Viewers will be able to watch Channel 4 on their computers by the end of the year, with news that the broadcaster is planning to simulcast all of its TV content via broadband.

At present, Channel 4 restricts its broadband content to repeats of shows such as 'Trick of the Mind', 'Johnny Vegas: 18 Stone of Idiot' and 'Jamie's School Dinners'.

However, the broadcaster is planning to make its entire schedule broadband-enabled and transmit its programming over the internet at the same time as the TV feed, via the Channel4.com website . . . .

Several months into 2006 and there's no sign of this yet, but I'll be keeping my eyes and ears open. Any chance you could get this up and running before this year's Big Brother, Channel 4?

But in the meantime, Channel 4 do have a whole section of their website devoted to Broadband video clips:

Channel 4 Video

Most of the site offers clips of Channel 4 programmes, previews and the like, but also included is this on-line movie show:

Movie Rush

This programme earns its way by linking minute - minute and a half features with Stella Artois ads. You can't launch it in a stand-alone player, but a right click on screen will allow full screen view. Also worth a mention is the Channel 4 News website, which provides a decent number of news reports taken from the programme:

Top 10 Video Clips -- News

But what the site does not yet have, and what would be particularly welcome, would be something paralleling the BBC News Player, which allows you not only to view these short reports but also to watch entire programmes. I do miss Channel 4 News at 7 each evening, so I look forward to the day when, perhaps, this will be available too. In the meantime, though, there is a new podcast presented by Jon Snow:

Jon Snow's Podcasts

And speaking of podcasts, that will be the topic of How to cope without British TV and Video Part IV.

Easter

Maundy Thursday found me helping in Lauren's class all day. We spent the morning "conducting an experiment" to see which of three brands of egg-dying kits are best. In the afternoon the children watched a cartoon about Spring and ate ice cream sundaes. They got the ice cream and one topping for free, but had to buy additional toppings with tokens they'd earned from learning their times tables -- an extra topping for each table learned. The children also had a special assembly with a boy-band performing for the school.

They had Good Friday off school, but nothing else special marked the day. Mark had to go to work as usual (as he is doing on Easter Monday). I think that next year I'll try and find a Good Friday church service to take the girls to. We need something to make the day more special. Today we went to church in the morning and to some friends' house for Easter lunch.

Mark has written about his Easter experience this year in his blog. I very much enjoyed reading it, especially as it made me very nostalgic for Oxford.

The Patriot Game

Bobby Convey

A few weeks ago, I was listening to Spike Lee being interviewed by Simon Mayo on Five Live. The topic was Spike Lee's new film Inside Man (which, by the way, is quite good fun, even if there isn't much depth to it; it got me on side straight away with some stylish opening credits and a good Bhangra track). The topic somehow got onto football (soccer) and the World Cup. Spike Lee said that he liked football and would be supporting Brazil because they're a good team.

This is what I want to know -- can he be tried for treason?

How can anyone support another country over their own? One's team can be the worst in the world, but it's one's patriotic duty to support them. By all means, once they've been knocked out of the competition, one can support whoever one likes; but until then, one should support their own.

Americans are patriotic people. You put flags everywhere -- in your schools, places of work and homes. You pledge allegiance to the flag. Perhaps Spike Lee is atypical in his disregard for his country when it comes to sport. OK, so the US are not among the best, but they're getting better with each World Cup.

If you're an American and a soccer fan, you should definitely get behind your team. Here's the USA's page on the FIFA World Cup website. It shows how they've been doing so far in friendly matches. Here's the match schedule. USA are in group E. Their first match is on the 12th of June at midday (EST), against the Czech Republic. Match coverage in the US is being provided by ABC Sports and ESPN. In addition, depending on your internet service provider, you may be able to watch all the matches in the entire World Cup live on the web at ESPN360. Here's the source of my information.

April 25, 2006

If you live in the US and are interested in European/British football, you may want to take a look at Mark's guest post on how to access European football from the US:
How to cope without British TV and Radio: Football Supplement

Doctorin' the TARDIS

The Doctor and Rose

Well, I've never known anything like it.

The first episode of the new series of Dr. Who aired today, in Britain, on BBC1 at 7:15pm (2:15pm here in NC). It finished at 8pm and by 9pm (that's just an hour), we got to download it (along with a few thousand others). Last night we watched a new children's programme that we downloaded for the kids, called Totally Dr. Who. It was like Blue Peter, but with footage from The Christmas Invasion's edition of Dr. Who Confidential. The only interesting part was a section about a couple of teenagers who make their own mini-episodes with a camcorder and PC, in their house and back garden. This reminded us of a certain friend who used to make his own Dr. Who movies as a child and had built (along with some friends) a full size Dalek in his garage, which he used to take along to conventions. Emily pronounced at the end of the programme that it was rubbish, so we may not be bothering with that again. Tonight, we've downloaded the latest Dr. Who Confidential to watch tomorrow night.

So, from here on in we're going to be watching the Christopher Eccleston series on Sci-Fi at the same time as watching the David Tennant series via the internet.

We've already promised the girls the DVDs as soon as they're released in the US.

(By the way, if you're wondering about the title of this post, it's taken from the title of the novelty single by The Timelords (a.k.a. The KLF).)

Weathering the Weather

A Hurricane

Last July, while we were on our scouting trip, before moving here, we experienced the worst thunderstorm of our lives. We were driving along the freeway. The rain was so heavy that we couldn't see farther than a few feet. The rain was sheeting down. The thunder thundered and lightening lit up the dark clouds. Many cars pulled in on the shoulder and under bridges, but we decided to keep going. There were many accidents that slowed us down even more. It took over three hours to do a forty-five minute journey.

As I write this it is 88oF (about 30oC), with a light breeze coming in through the windows. The severe drought continues, as do the water restrictions. According to Weather Central, there are chances of thunderstorms this afternoon and tonight.

Since moving here, we've realised that extremes in weather are a fact of life. A beautiful hot day can easily turn into thunderstorms. Rainclouds can appear without warning, drop their payload, then disappear again, to reveal a cloudless blue sky, just as suddenly as they appeared. We have experienced several thunderstorms that are worse than anything we've ever experienced in England. Any given part of NC can expect about 40-50 thunderstorms a year, mostly in the summer. These storms cause about $5 million damage per year. Even so, buildings tend to be stick-built and don't tend to have lightening rods. The story of the three little pigs comes to mind. If your house is in danger in being blown down, it may be prudent to build it out of something stronger than sticks.

NC also averages about 2 hurricanes per year. It is the coast that bears the brunt of these.

A Tornado

The other extreme weather is the tornado. Tornadoes are not unheard of in the UK, but are rare and are rarely big. The Birmingham tornado hit while we were on our reconnaissance trip last July. Although we haven't experienced a tornado yet, we have had several tornado warnings. They tend to come hand in hand with the severe storm warnings.

NC is not exactly Tornado Alley, but it turns out that it gets an average of about three tornadoes a year. This is enough for tornado drills to be a part of school life for the girls, as are fire drills. Apparently, in the event of a tornado, one is supposed to find an inside room on the ground floor, where all the walls are not exterior walls. One is supposed to crouch into a ball in this inner room until the tornado is passed. As our house is entirely open plan -- this advice is fairly useless. The advice for storms is to stay at home and keep away from electrical/electronic devices and telephones.

All things considered, however, the weather at this time of year is fantastic. It's like a perfect summer -- hot and sunny, but with a cooling breeze. The windows are open and the fans are on. At the height of summer it will be too hot to open the windows and we will need to turn on the air conditioning, so we plan to enjoy every second of this perfect weather while it lasts.

Franz Ferdinand

When we first moved here, everywhere I went and everything I did would be with the thought:

"OH MY GOODNESS, WE ARE LIVING IN AMERICA!!!".

Everything seemed alien to us. Now, I've just about got used to the house. Stepping out of the house and walking the children to school still brings on a less pronounced:

"OH MY GOODNESS, WE ARE LIVING IN AMERICA!!!".

Eventually, I dare say, it will become:

"Yeah, we're living in America, no big deal."

Even though we're getting used to being here and are starting to settle in, there is still occasionally something that once again highlights the fact that the Atlantic is a very big pond.

This story is one such case. All the clues were there. At the end of this story you will all wonder how we can be so stupid and the only defence that I have to offer is that, although the truth was there for anyone to see, our expectations were so strong that we were blinded to the blindingly obvious.

When we found out that Franz Ferdinand were playing at Duke's Cameron Indoor Stadium and that Duke had a number of cut-price tickets set aside for staff and students, we jumped at the chance.

The Ticket

We were quite pleased that they had managed to cross the Atlantic divide and make it big here (big enough to fill a 9000-seater stadium; compare this with the 200 or so people who came to see The Wedding Present). When we got the tickets, we found that they were being supported by an American band that we'd never heard of called Death Cab for Cutie. This is where we missed the first clue (see picture of ticket). We thought it strange that the support band is listed first, but after all, they're on first and perhaps that's how they do it in America.

Anyone with half a braincell has by now realised our mistake, but not us. Our stupidity runs much deeper than this.

Death Cab for Cutie

We took the liberty of downloading the latest Death Cab for Cutie album from the internet before the gig, so we had an idea of what they were like. They were decidedly uninspiring. Each song started with what can be described as a promising intro, but failed to develop into anything more interesting. The entire album lacked (as the French would say) a certain "I don't know what" and by the end I was quite bored with it. Nevertheless, they weren't rubbish -- they were obviously trying hard, but only succeeded in coming across as a bit pretentious. I thought that, although they're no Franz Ferdinand, they'd probably be OK as a support band.

The second clue came on the night of the gig (Friday), when the babysitter became animated to hear that we were going to see Death Cab for Cutie, but had never heard of Franz Ferdinand. Still, we were too slow to understand the implications of this and dismissed it out of hand.

The doors were due to open at 5:30 and the first band was due to come on at 7:00. I have never known a gig that starts on time (apart from the one at the Cat's Cradle), so we got there at about 7:30. The queue was very long. We wondered why entry to the stadium was taking so long, even though everyone seemed to already have tickets. The event staff were keen to keep reassuring the queue that they need not worry and they won't miss the show. From this, we assumed that they were running a bit behind with getting everyone in so were delaying the start of the gig. Forty five minutes later, we reached the front of the queue and realised what was taking so long. The security was strict enough to rival an airport. EVERY SINGLE PERSON was being individually searched before being allowed in. Come to think of it, even airport security isn't that tight!

Franz Ferdinand

Anyway, we finally took our seats at about 8:15 only to find that Franz Ferdinand were already on stage and happily playing away to their hearts' content. We were very annoyed because not only had we missed the entire support, but had also missed some of Franz Ferdinand. I didn't want this to spoil the night, so I worked hard at trying to overcome my (as I thought) righteous anger.

Herein lies another couple of clues. Timing wise, if the support came on at 7:00, then if Franz Ferdinand came on at about 8:00 and played for about an hour and a half, they'd be finished by 9:30, which is far too early for a gig to end. I tried to justify this problem with timing by thinking that perhaps they would be doing an extra-long set. I wasn't happy with this explanation, but couldn't think of a better one. The other clue was that people who were behind us in the queue were still rolling in about half an hour later than us, but didn't seem to be in the slightest bit bothered that they'd missed most of the show.

Franz Ferdinand were excellent. Despite my negative feelings about missing half the gig, I could not fault their performance (what there was of it). We only got to hear about 8 to 10 songs before they went off stage at about 9:00, all the lights came on and people started filing out. There was not even the sniff of a possible encore. Mark and I looked at each other and wondered aloud what was going on. It was only then that the penny dropped and the unthinkable became thinkable.

The Cribs

Franz Ferdinand were the support band. We were so starting to get used to living in the US that we'd forgotten that in Wonderland many things can be topsy-turvy. Franz Ferdinand are not big in the USA, but the band that we'd never heard of is. All the anomalies were instantly explained and everything started to make sense.

There was also another band, called The Cribs who were on at 7:00-ish, followed by Franz Ferdinand at 8:00-ish and the main band, Death Cab for Cutie, at nearly 9:30. I've heard of The Cribs, but have never heard them, so was very disappointed when I found out that I'd missed them.

Death Cab for Cutie came on. Armed with the realisation that they were the main band; and upon witnessing the increased excitement of the crowd, I became determined to see the good in them. I thought, "They must be better live than their album suggests for them to be so popular". I was already familiar with many of the songs that they played from their album, but unfortunately, despite my initial enthusiasm and desperation to take home something good from the evening, after five or six songs I had to admit to myself that I was bored and that Death Cab for Cutie lacked both interest and stage presence (especially as a follow-on from Franz Ferdinand). By the time they were half way through the second song of their encore I found myself hoping that there would not be a third. By this stage, many of those near us who donned Franz Ferdinand T-shirts had already left.

Even with all that went wrong (missing The Cribs and the start of Franz Ferdinand), just going out together was fun. Also, to put it into perspective, Death Cab for Cutie weren't bad. It's more that it surprised me that they were good enough to almost fill a 9000 seater stadium. I say "almost fill" because it was clear that there were many who, like us, had gone to see Franz Ferdinand; although I doubt that any of them were as stupid as us in not realising that they were the support band.

All in all, despite everything, we had a thoroughly good night out.

So, what is the moral of this story? What were the lessons to be learnt?

1. Don't expect bands that are big everywhere else in the world to be big in the USA.
2. Don't expect that just because a band is big in the USA, we'll have heard of it.
3. Expect there to be an extra support band that has not been billed. This seems to be the done thing in the US. When we went to see The Wedding Present there was an unexpected extra band as well.
4. Expect US gigs to start on time.

Epilogue:

Since Friday, we've downloaded an excellent live recording of a Franz Ferdinand gig in Berlin last year. It really is very good.

The other thing is that it seems that Death Cab for Cutie have done several small-venue European tours over the past 3-4 years, but it's just that we'd never heard of them. It also turns out that on the current tour they are supposedly "co-headlining" with Franz Ferdinand. This was far from the reality that we experienced.

On the bright side, at least we got the T-shirt:

Signs of Life in Britain

There's a fun post on road signs in Britain from a Canadian perspective at The Anglo File, Too. There's also a good post with photos of views in Snowdonia.